A320neo vs 737-900ER
The 737-900ER typically seats about 13 more passengers, while the A320neo flies about 1,040 km further. The 737-900ER flew first, 8 years earlier.
A320neo · 37.6 m
737-900ER · 42.1 m
| Airbus A320neo | Boeing 737-900ER | |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Airbus | Boeing |
| First flight | 2014 | 2006 |
| Typical seats | 165 | 178 |
| Range | 6,500 km | 5,460 km |
| Length | 37.6 m | 42.1 m |
| Engines | 2 × jet | 2 × jet |
| Body | Narrow-body | Narrow-body |
● marks the higher figure. Bigger isn’t always better: airlines pick the size that fits the route.
More comparisons
- A320neo vs 737 MAX 8
- 737-900ER vs A321
- COMAC C919 vs A320neo
- A320neo vs 737-800
- 737-900ER vs A320
- 737 MAX 7 vs A320neo
- 737 MAX 9 vs A320neo
- A220-300 vs A320neo
- COMAC C919 vs 737-900ER
- 737-900ER vs 737-600
- All 287 comparisons
Know your airliners? Test yourself on today’s mystery aircraft.
Play today’s game